Case 2201831/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lauren v O’Brien AND PSDG International Ltd. — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201831/2022
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Lauren
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that no response to the claim had been presented. It also states that, despite service of documents on the parties and correspondence from the tribunal, neither party attended the remote hearing listed for 10 June 2022.
Pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment does not set out findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and does not record any monetary award.
The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type in the body of the judgment. The case was therefore disposed of on a non-attendance/default basis rather than after a merits hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s). It records that no response was presented and that, because neither party attended the remote hearing on 10 June 2022, the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.