Case 2201876/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Doga v Maccorp UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201876/2020
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Doga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs L Doga worked for Maccorp UK Ltd as a Trainee Foreign Exchange Cashier from 1 November 2019 until summary termination on 17 March 2020. The tribunal found that the 23 October 2019 offer letter was the contractual document given to her, that it did not incorporate the respondent's 7-page template, that no employee handbook was produced, and that the 2020 Operations Manual was not shown to have been provided or treated as contractually binding. On that basis, the respondent had no contractual term authorising deductions for till errors or alleged forged-banknote losses.
The claimant accepted responsibility for two card-processing errors on 6 January 2020 and signed a repayment arrangement for £518.57 in two instalments. The tribunal held that her consent to that arrangement was effective, but that she was in retail employment within section 17 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so deductions for cash shortages were subject to the section 18 10% cap on relevant pay days. The £6.89 deduction in December 2019 was allowed, but the January 2020 deduction of £259.29 exceeded the cap by £163.65 and the February 2020 deduction exceeded the cap by £296.29. The tribunal also found no evidential basis for any deduction for alleged forged-banknote losses of £898.38.
For March 2020, the tribunal held that the final instalment of wages was paid on 31 March 2020 and that the section 18 cap did not apply to that final instalment. It accepted that the March £133 till-error deduction was authorised against the remaining agreed balance, but found that the respondent underpaid salary for 1 to 17 March by applying an impermissible shift-pattern calculation rather than a pro rata daily calculation. The amount properly payable for that period was £743.61, the amount paid was £410.50, and the resulting unauthorised deduction was £333.11. The claim succeeded in the total gross sum of £793.05, subject only to PAYE deductions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment held that the claimant's January and February 2020 till-error deductions were unauthorised to the extent they exceeded the section 18 retail cap, the March 2020 till-error deduction was authorised, and the March 2020 salary for 1 to 17 March was underpaid by £333.11. The reasons section records the February till-error deduction as £412.27 at para 34.4.2, but the conclusions section uses £412.87 at para 61; the total award is stated as £793.05. | Upheld | — | £793 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £793
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.17 ERA 1996 retail employment
- s.18 ERA 1996 10% cap
- s.22 ERA 1996 final instalment of wages
- s.23 ERA 1996 time limits
- s.27 ERA 1996 wages
- Laird v AK Stoddart Ltd
- Fairfield Ltd v Skinner
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.