Case 2201879/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms F Mewies, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201879/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Locker-Townsend brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages, holiday pay, and breach of contract arising from alleged unpaid notice pay and commission. At the hearing he confirmed that he was not bringing a notice pay claim. The parties agreed that 4.5 days' holiday pay had accrued on termination, and the tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £510.53 gross for that amount.
The remaining dispute concerned commission said to be due in respect of two placements, Itelligence AG and Heidelberg Cement, allegedly payable in March 2020. The contract provided that the Claimant had no contractual right to commission, and that any commission would be calculated in accordance with the Respondent's commission policy. The tribunal accepted that the policy was available on the HR portal and that the Claimant had access to it.
The policy stated that an employee had to be in employment and not under notice of termination to be eligible for commission, and that commission was paid in arrears two months after the candidate's start date once the client invoice had been paid. The tribunal found that the Claimant was under notice on 18 and 19 March 2020, so he was not eligible for commission in March 2020. It found no custom or practice giving a different result, held that there was no contractual entitlement to the commission claimed, and concluded that the failure to pay it was neither a breach of contract nor an unlawful deduction from wages because the commission was not properly payable.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The parties agreed that 4.5 days' holiday pay was accrued on termination and that £510.53 gross was payable. | Upheld | — | £511 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found no contractual entitlement to the commission claimed. Clause 10.2 stated there was no contractual right to commission, and any commission would have been subject to the commission policy; the Claimant was under notice of termination and therefore ineligible under that policy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that commission was not 'properly payable' under the contract and commission policy, so the Respondent's failure to pay it did not amount to an unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £511
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.