Case 2201892/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Sarmiento Mayta v Power Cleaning Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201892/2024
- Decision date
- 3 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anthony REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Sarmiento Mayta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs T Sarmiento Mayta's claim against Power Cleaning Services Limited was heard by CVP at London Central Employment Tribunal on 7 June 2024. Neither party attended. Upon considering the available information, Employment Judge Anthony dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because of non-attendance.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints and records no monetary award. It was sent to the parties on 3 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the claim as a whole under rule 47 for non-attendance. It did not set out a separate merits determination for this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment dismissed the claim as a whole under rule 47 for non-attendance. It did not set out a separate merits determination for this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismissed the claim as a whole under rule 47 for non-attendance. It did not set out a separate merits determination for this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.