Case 2201900/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Vladimir Markou v Ellinikon Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201900/2020
- Decision date
- 22 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation For
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Vladimir Markou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 November 2021, before Tribunal Judge Plowright acting as an Employment Judge, the claimant appeared in person with the support of an interpreter and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal found that Ellinikon Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £14,015.80 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to a payment because the respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. It ordered two weeks' gross pay, assessed at £1,938 on the basis of £969 per week. The total award was therefore £15,953.80 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £14,015.80. | Upheld | — | £14,016 |
| Other | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a payment because the respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and ordered two weeks' gross pay of £1,938 (£969 x 2). | Upheld | — | £1,938 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,954
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.