Case 2201903/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs K Williams (2) Mr A Cooper (3) Ms M Latham (4) Mr P Thompson (5) Ms N Solanki (6) Ms M Sharp (7) Ms J Postins (8) Mr K Mole (9) Ms L Middleton (10) Ms N Price (11) Mrs E Page v British Telecommunications plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201903/2021
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JOFFE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs K Williams (2) Mr A Cooper (3) Ms M Latham (4) Mr P Thompson (5) Ms N Solanki (6) Ms M Sharp (7) Ms J Postins (8) Mr K Mole (9) Ms L Middleton (10) Ms N Price (11) Mrs E Page
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants withdrew their claims for direct age discrimination, redundancy payments and 'other payments'. The tribunal dismissed those claims on withdrawal.
The judgment records that all other claims would proceed to hearing. It does not determine those remaining claims or address any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claimants' claims for direct age discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimants. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimants' claims for redundancy payments were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this as claims for 'other payments' and states they were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimants; the precise legal classification is not clear from the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.