Miss A Nunes Mari v Maggie and Rose — 2024

Case reference: 2201921/2024
Decision date: 22 April 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Baty

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Nunes Mari

Respondent

Maggie and Rose

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that it had sent communications to Miss A Nunes Mari on 22 April 2024 and 25 June 2024 and received no reply. The 25 June 2024 communication asked her to confirm whether she wished to continue with the claim or whether it had been settled or withdrawn.

On 28 June 2024, Employment Judge Baty issued a strike out warning because the claim was being considered for strike out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The warning invited the claimant to object in writing by 12 July 2024 or request a hearing, but no response was received.

The tribunal therefore concluded that the claim had not been actively pursued. It also noted that several attempts had been made to contact the claimant without any response, and it exercised its discretion to strike the claim out. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claim and records no award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that the claim was not actively pursued and was struck out after no response to tribunal communications.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.