Case 2201931/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2201931/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 October 2019, before Employment Judge A James, the tribunal heard oral evidence from the claimant and legal submissions from both sides. The only claim recorded in the judgment was a breach of contract claim brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.
The tribunal found that the claim had not been presented within time. It also found that it would have been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim and that it could not be considered further.
No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 was not presented within time. It found that it would have been reasonably practicable for the claimant to have submitted the claim in time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim further. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.