Case 2201931/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms M Hughes (solicitor) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201931/2021
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 August 2022, Employment Judge P Klimov, sitting alone, held that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s claims. The written judgment records that the claimant was Mr S Schollick and the respondent was Lyfe Technology Ltd, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms M Hughes, solicitor.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of any complaint. Instead, it found that all of the claimant’s claims in these proceedings had to be dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear them.
The decision was given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; the tribunal did not reach the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; the tribunal did not reach the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.