Case 2201940/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Angela Pappin - Cole v Haus Management Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201940/2021
- Decision date
- 18 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sullivan Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Angela Pappin - Cole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sullivan heard the matter at London Central by video on 18 July 2022. The claimant, Angela Pappin-Cole, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or represent itself. The written judgment records that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded, and it also records that the respondent's failure to pay wages and accrued holiday pay gave rise to successful claims.
The tribunal ordered payment of a basic award of £2,176 for unfair dismissal, £15,000 for unlawfully deducted wages, and £2,769.24 for unpaid accrued holiday pay. The judgment states that the awards for unlawfully deducted wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are gross amounts, and that the respondent is responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions due on them. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim succeeded; reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the written record. | Upheld | — | £2,176 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award is stated as gross; the respondent is responsible for income tax and national insurance contributions on this sum. | Upheld | — | £15,000 |
| Holiday pay | The award is stated as gross; the respondent is responsible for income tax and national insurance contributions on this sum. | Upheld | — | £2,769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,945
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,176
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.