Case 2201948/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Campana v 1 Stop Wash Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201948/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Campana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr A Campana, appeared in person. The Respondent, 1 Stop Wash Ltd, presented no response and took no part in the proceedings. On 11 August 2023, Employment Judge A M Snelson determined the case on the papers and found both claims well-founded.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the Respondent to pay £900 in respect of that claim. It also upheld the Claimant’s claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for compensation for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination of employment and ordered payment of £503 in respect of that claim.
The judgment states that the sums in paragraphs (1) and (2) are expressed as net figures. The tribunal noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable, and that the Respondent is to calculate and account to HMRC for any such amounts. The Respondent was directed to pay the stated sums to the Claimant in full without making any deduction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was expressed as a net figure; the tribunal noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable and that the Respondent should account to HMRC if required. | Upheld | — | £900 |
| Working time regulations | The award was expressed as a net figure for outstanding annual leave on termination; the tribunal noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable and that the Respondent should account to HMRC if required. | Upheld | — | £503 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,403
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.