Case 2201949/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Strand Palace Hotel and Restaurants Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201949/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Members
- Panel members
- Ms S Samek, Ms S Boyce
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs T. Osei brought claims against Strand Palace Hotel and Restaurants Ltd for direct race discrimination, unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, and a failure to award a pay increase on or about 24 October 2018. The case was heard at Central London Employment Tribunal on 18 to 20 February 2020 before Employment Judge Nicolle with members Ms S Samek and Ms S Boyce.
The tribunal dismissed the direct race discrimination claim. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. No remedy was awarded on either of those claims.
The judgment records that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed, and that the claim concerning the alleged failure to award a pay increase on or about 24 October 2018 was also withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Claim for direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to award a pay increase on or about 24 October 2018 was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.