Case 2201973/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Braithwaite v Clarkson Murphy Partners Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201973/2022
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Connolly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Braithwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge S Connolly therefore determined the claim on the ET1 without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from Ms N Braithwaite’s wages. It ordered Clarkson Murphy Partners Ltd to pay her £690, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted.
The judgment records that the respondent is entitled to make deductions for tax and national insurance before payment. No other claim, remedy element, or separate liability finding is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, with the respondent entitled to deduct tax and national insurance before payment. | Upheld | — | £690 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £690
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.