Case 2201985/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Seasons FH Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201985/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response to the ET1. Employment Judge E Burns therefore decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing. The respondent's name was amended to Seasons FH Ltd.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked for the respondent between 1 and 27 February 2022 and was not paid for that work. On the offer letter provided, the agreed salary was £30,000 per annum, which the tribunal calculated as £576.92 gross per week.
The tribunal held that four weeks' gross pay was due, amounting to £2,307.68, and ordered the respondent to pay that sum within 14 days, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance to be paid to HMRC. The listed hearing on 18 August 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant worked for the respondent from 1 to 27 February 2022 and was not paid. It calculated four weeks' gross pay at £576.92 per week based on an agreed salary of £30,000 per annum. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,308
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,308
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.