Case 2202007/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Gadiparthi v K4S Security Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2202007/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Gadiparthi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, K4S Security Ltd, did not present a response to the claim. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been served and that the tribunal had emailed the respondent on 21 June 2022 at email addresses supplied by the claimant, but there was no reply. On that basis, and pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded.
The tribunal made an award of £2,592 gross, payable by the respondent to the claimant. The judgment states that this sum comprised 24 days' unpaid wages in September and October 2021. The hearing listed for 29 June 2022 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent. The award was stated to be gross and comprised 24 days' unpaid wages in September and October 2021. | Upheld | — | £2,592 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,592
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.