Case 2202022/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Rendon Pineda v Apollo Employee Services LLP and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202022/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elliott
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Rendon Pineda
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case No. 2202022/2019, Ms S Rendon Pineda brought proceedings against Apollo Employee Services LLP and Sumitomo Corporation Europe Limited. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, and no substantive liability findings are recorded.
The text does not set out findings on the underlying discrimination or wage issues, and it records no remedy, award, or costs order. Employment Judge Elliott signed the judgment under the withdrawal rule.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not contain separate substantive findings on this claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not contain separate substantive findings on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.