Case 2202055/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Burke v British Tourist Authority t/a Visit Britain/Visit 2.Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202055/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Burke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a part judgment on withdrawal dated 4 October 2019 in case 2202055/2019. Employment Judge Brown recorded that the complaints of race discrimination and health and safety breaches were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Mr M Burke, against British Tourist Authority t/a Visit Britain/Visit and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport.
The judgment did not determine the remaining claims. It stated that the claimant's remaining claim(s) would proceed to hearing on 9 to 10 and 13 to 17 January 2020.
No remedy was recorded in this judgment, and no legal test or substantive findings on liability were set out beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal of the two complaints identified above.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of race discrimination was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the complaints of health and safety breaches were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. No more specific statutory claim type is identified in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.