Case 2202071/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Grzegorz Jarzabek v Further Underwriting International SLU Frank Ahedo Tatianna Macias Ignacio San Miguel Antonio Lubrano — 2024
- Case reference
- 2202071/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Grzegorz Jarzabek
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the oral hearing on 14 November 2024, Employment Judge Gidney dismissed the claim of automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure under s103A ERA 1996. The tribunal also dismissed the claim of detriment for making a public interest disclosure under s47B ERA 1996.
The remaining claims were not determined at that hearing. The tribunal recorded that the ordinary unfair dismissal claim under s98(4) ERA 1996 would continue to trial, as would the claim for unlawful deduction from wages under s13 ERA 1996. It also noted that the mediation case management hearing listed for 25 November 2024 should be vacated because the remaining claims no longer qualified for mediation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure under s103A ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment for making a public interest disclosure under s47B ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s103A ERA 1996
- s47B ERA 1996
- s98(4) ERA 1996
- s13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.