Case 2202084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v SEaB Power Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2202084/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Baxter brought a complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that he had suffered unlawful deductions from his wages in the sum of £6,397.16 net. Employment Judge A Stewart, sitting alone at London Central on 13 June 2024, found that complaint well-founded and allowed it to succeed.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had suffered further losses of £2,357.28 as a direct result of the unlawful deductions. It therefore ordered the Respondent, SEAB Power Ltd t/a SEAB Energy, to pay £6,397.16 plus £2,357.28, making a total of £8,754.44, within 14 days of the hearing. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the section 23 ERA 1996 unlawful deductions claim and ordered payment of the deducted wages plus further direct losses. | Upheld | — | £8,754 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,754
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.