Case 2202085/2024 · Employment Tribunal

George Pearson v Mace Consult Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under — 2024

Case reference: 2202085/2024
Decision date: 6 September 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Deol

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

George Pearson

Respondent

Mace Consult Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The supplied document is a certificate of correction under rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It states that the judgment sent to the parties on 6 September 2024 contained an incorrect case number and corrects it from 2200256/2023 to 2202085/2024.

The certificate is signed by Employment Judge Deol and dated 20 October 2024, with the corrected document sent to the parties on 21 October 2024. It also states that the time limits for asking for written reasons, applying for reconsideration, or appealing are unchanged and continue to run from the date the original judgment or reasons were sent.

No substantive findings on the underlying employment claims, liability, or remedy are set out in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The supplied text is only a Rule 69 certificate of correction. It records that the case number in the judgment sent to the parties on 6 September 2024 was corrected from 2200256/2023 to 2202085/2024. No substantive claim, liability finding, or remedy is set out in the provided text.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.