Case 2202091/2021 · Employment Tribunal
v Mr Constantin Rotaru v MPL Site Services (Heathrow) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2202091/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
v Mr Constantin Rotaru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered MPL Site Services Limited to pay £128.00 gross. That was the only sum awarded in the judgment.
The record also states that the remainder of the claimant's claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. In addition, a complaint of compensation pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. No separate compensation or interest award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £128.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £128 |
| Other | Complaint of compensation pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £128
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.