Case 2202161/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202161/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 6 March 2020, Employment Judge Glennie found that Ms Sharkey was not, at the material time, a person with a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the complaint of discrimination arising from disability was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the complaints under sections 12(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, concerning detriment on the grounds of exercising the right to be accompanied, were not determined at this hearing. Those complaints were listed to remain for a later hearing beginning on 22 June 2020 before an Employment Judge sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant was not, at the material time, a person with a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, so the complaint of discrimination arising from disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.