Case 2202168/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202168/2019
- Decision date
- 7 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMy Library Limited was added as a respondent to the claims. The respondents did not appear or have representation at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondents made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages for 6 days worked between 1 and 7 March 2019, contrary to s 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that the respondents failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday for the claimant's employment from 10 December 2018 until 7 March 2019, contrary to regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1999.
The respondents were ordered to pay wages of £600 and accrued holiday pay of £770.06, and to account to HMRC for any tax due on those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages for 6 days worked between 1 and 7 March 2019, contrary to s 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday over the period of employment from 10 December 2018 until 7 March 2019, contrary to regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1999. | Upheld | — | £770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,370
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.