Case 2202188/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Transferroom Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202188/2020
- Decision date
- 14 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to present a response, and Employment Judge Adkin determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis of the ET1 and further correspondence from the Claimant.
The tribunal held that the Respondent unlawfully deducted the Claimant’s wages within section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate findings are set out in the extracted text beyond that determination.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £2,128.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondent did not file an ET3. The judgment was issued under rule 21 on the basis of the ET1 and further correspondence from the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £2,128 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,128
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.