Case 2202191/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202191/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent's name on the file to add "in liquidation" and gave the claimant permission to amend the claim to add complaints of unlawful deduction from wages for April and May 2020 and non-payment of notice pay as breach of contract.
The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded. The Tribunal awarded gross pay for March 2020, April 2020 and part of May 2020, together with commission payments net of tax and national insurance.
The complaint of breach of contract for non-payment of notice pay was also well founded, and the Tribunal awarded one month's net pay. The Tribunal also made a preparation time order under Rule 76, stating that the respondent had acted unreasonably in the way the proceedings were conducted.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprises gross pay for March 2020, April 2020 and part of May 2020, plus commission payments net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £12,639 |
| Breach of contract | Non-payment of notice pay; compensation awarded as one month's net pay. | Upheld | — | £1,823 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,942
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 76
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.