Case 2202197/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Morgan-Grenville v Bondford Group Limited «resp_others» — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202197/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Morgan-Grenville
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the Employment Tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. The extracted text does not identify the precise cause of action, so the adjudicated claim is recorded as other. No substantive reasons on liability are given in the extracted text beyond the default judgment outcome.
The tribunal said the claimant's remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. It listed that hearing for 30 October 2019 at Victory House, London, and directed the claimant to bring documents relevant to the value of the claim. It also said that if sufficient information could be provided before 30 October 2019, consideration would be given to issuing a judgment without the need to attend the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no split between heads of loss is provided. The document is limited to the default liability finding and the procedural directions for determining remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 default judgment. The decision states only that 'the claim succeeds' and that the remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing; the extracted text does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.