Case 2202202/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Tudose v VG Medispa (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2202202/2019
- Decision date
- 16 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Tudose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Central London Employment Tribunal on 12 July 2021, Employment Judge Norris sat alone. Ms A Tudose appeared in person. VG Medispa (in voluntary liquidation) did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for unlawful deductions from pay, notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay succeeded.
The tribunal ordered gross payments of £1,900.00 for unlawful deductions from pay, £237.50 for holiday pay, and £475.00 for notice pay. It directed that the claimant was responsible for accounting for her own tax and/or any National Insurance contributions payable.
The tribunal also ordered a further £135.00 without deduction pursuant to s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996, bringing the total amount payable to £2,747.50. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,900 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £238 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also ordered a further £135.00 without deduction pursuant to s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,748
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.