Case 2202203/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Amy Lam — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202203/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 without a hearing, and the hearing listed for 29 October 2019 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and ordered payment of £660 net. | Upheld | — | £660 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay and ordered £184.21 net for accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £184 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £844
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.