Mr T Ogunnaike v Badoo Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2202211/2019
Decision date: 10 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Walker

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr T Ogunnaike

Respondent

Badoo Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Walker issued a rule 52 judgment on 17 October 2019. The judgment records that the complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.

The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim or claims would proceed to hearing pursuant to the order made on 10 October 2019. No findings on the merits, legal tests, or monetary remedy are recorded in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment states that the complaint of failure to pay notice pay was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Holiday pay	The judgment states that the complaint of failure to pay holiday pay was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.