Case 2202223/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Marsan v Big Marcel Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202223/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs J Marsan
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment dated 5 November 2019, made in default because the respondents did not present a response within the time limit. Employment Judge Spencer held that the proper respondent to the proceedings was the second respondent, Die With Your Boots On Ltd, rather than Big Marcel Ltd.
The tribunal found that the second respondent had made unauthorized deductions from Mrs J Marsan's wages. The judgment identified two elements: £194,664.08 for the unpaid balance of net pay, and £78,300 gross for employee pension contributions deducted from salary but not paid to the pension provider, together with employer contributions due but also unpaid.
The tribunal also found that Mrs J Marsan had been constructively dismissed and ordered the second respondent to pay £150,904 damages in respect of failure to give notice. The judgment states that the respondent was ordered to pay £423,868, and notes that the figures marked with an asterisk are gross amounts subject to appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance so that payment of the net sum would discharge the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorized deductions from wages comprising the unpaid balance of net pay (£194,664.08) and pension contributions deducted from salary but not paid to the pension provider, together with employer contributions due but unpaid (£78,300 gross). | Upheld | — | £272,964 |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and ordered damages in respect of failure to give notice. | Upheld | — | £150,904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £423,868
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.