Case 2202230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Wood & others (see attached schedule) v Utilitywise plc (in Administration) and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202230/2019
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs H Wood & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded no attendance by the claimants and no attendance or appearance by the respondents at the hearing on 26 February 2020.
Employment Judge Johnson found that the claims of the claimants named in the attached schedule under S.189 of the Act were well founded. The judgment made a protective award for those claimants who were employees dismissed as redundant on 13 February 2019.
The employer was ordered to pay remuneration for a protected period beginning on 13 February 2019 and lasting 90 days. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations apply, but it does not state a monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes claims under S.189 of the Act as well founded and makes a protective award. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so this is classified as other rather than redundancy_pay because no redundancy payment claim was adjudicated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- S.189 of the Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.