Mr Q Sheik v 1989 Group Limited — 2022

Case reference: 2202262/2022
Decision date: 10 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Wade Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Q Sheik

Respondent

1989 Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent, 1989 Group Ltd, did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal therefore determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, without a hearing, after considering the ET1.

The judgment records that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant, Mr Q Sheik. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay unpaid wages of £2,762.04 net and directed that the respondent account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on that net sum.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance and the tribunal decided the claim could be determined without a hearing. The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages and orders unpaid wages of £2,762.04 net, with tax and NI to be accounted for to HMRC on that net sum.	Upheld	—	£2,762

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,762; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.