Case 2202278/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Blue Groove Soundz — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202278/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance by the deadline of 16 June 2020, and no explanation or extension application was provided. Employment Judge Nicolle therefore determined the claim without a hearing under Rule 21.
On the ET1, the Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages for 91 hours worked by Ms J Power between 25 November 2019 and 24 December 2019. Applying the claimant's hourly rate of £12, the unpaid wages came to £1,092 gross.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay Ms Power £1,092 gross in unpaid wages. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any applicable tax and employee national insurance contributions on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment was entered after the Respondent failed to file an ET3 by the required date and no extension application was made. The Tribunal found the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages for 91 hours worked between 25 November 2019 and 24 December 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,092 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,092
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.