Case 2202284/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Radleypost Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202284/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondents did not file any ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and holiday pay to the claimant. It ordered payment of £1,950 gross for unpaid wages and £750 gross for accrued holiday pay. The hearing listed for 7 November 2019 was vacated as a result of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages; the ordered sum for unpaid wages was £1,950 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,950 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay; the ordered sum for accrued holiday pay was £750 gross. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.