Case 2202300/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Sanchez v Bug Busters UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202300/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Sanchez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms A Sanchez's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and failed. No monetary award was made.
The tribunal also dealt with the reference under section 11(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that the 'contract of employment' dated 10 November 2014 complied with Part 1 of the Act. It recorded that the particulars were as stated in that contract and that the rates of pay for subsequent assignments had been stated at the outset of each assignment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the complaint was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal answered the section 11(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 reference by finding that the 10 November 2014 contract complied with Part 1 of the Act and that the particulars and subsequent pay rates were as stated. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.