Case 2202331/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v ZG Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202331/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was brought by Mrs S Toft against ZG Services Ltd. The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance, so Employment Judge JL Wade determined the case on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 without a hearing.
On the ET1, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay a redundancy payment to the claimant. The judgment does not set out any disputed factual findings beyond the absence of a response from the respondent.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,540 to the claimant. No separate remedy breakdown is given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. On the ET1, Employment Judge Wade decided the claim could be determined without a hearing and held that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,540 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,540
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.