Case 2202339/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Davidson, counsel For 1st and 5th v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2202339/2020
- Decision date
- 14 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elliott Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr L Davidson, counsel For 1st and 5th
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant. The judgment states that the claims succeeded, except for one claim for unlawful deductions from wages relating to the cost of a flight.
The unlawful deductions from wages claim for the flight cost of £102.99 failed and was dismissed. The extracted judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claims succeed, save for one unlawful deductions from wages item. No written reasons or remedy breakdown are provided in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claims succeed, save for one unlawful deductions from wages item. No written reasons or remedy breakdown are provided in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claims succeed, save for one unlawful deductions from wages item. No written reasons or remedy breakdown are provided in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claims succeed, save for the separate claim for unlawful deductions from wages for the cost of a flight, which was dismissed. No remedy breakdown is provided in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deductions from wages for the cost of a flight in the sum of £102.99 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.