Case 2202400/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Payne, counsel (direct access) For the v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 2202400/2018
- Decision date
- 9 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D. Payne, counsel (direct access) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Goodman on 8 October 2018 at London Central in the case of Mr S. T. Hudur v Busaba Eathai Ltd. The only recorded decision is that the claimant was a person under a disability by reason of back pain from November 2016.
The record does not set out substantive liability findings on any underlying discrimination, breach of contract, whistleblowing, race discrimination, or unlawful deduction claims. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that the claimant was a person under a disability by reason of back pain from November 2016. The record states that reasons were given orally and no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.