Case 2202416/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M McEntee v Monzo Bank Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202416/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M McEntee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss M McEntee’s unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37. It recorded that by letter dated 30 September 2019 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not been employed for two years or more.
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment states that the claimant’s remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 30 March to 2 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not been employed for two years or more and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning letter dated 30 September 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.