Case 2202424/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Babalola, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202424/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms F Babalola, Solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in the Employment Tribunal at London Central on 24 September 2019 before Employment Judge Davidson. The only determination recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant's application for Interim Relief failed and was dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figures are given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for Interim Relief dismissed at a preliminary hearing. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.