Case 2202426/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Devereux Roberts v Jobu London Limited (Company number 12052464) Hearing at London Central (CVP) on 27 August 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 2202426/2025
- Decision date
- 27 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henderson Attendance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Devereux Roberts
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a CVP hearing at London Central on 27 August 2025 before Employment Judge Henderson, judgment was granted against the respondent under Rule 22(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The respondent had not presented a response within the requisite time and at the hearing confirmed that no part of the claim was contested.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded in respect of December 2024 wages and ordered payment of £4,166.66 gross. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was also well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £4,166.66 representing four weeks' notice pay, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likelihood of Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment.
Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,500, being five weeks' pay capped at £700 per week. The total monetary payment owed to the claimant was £11,833.32.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for December 2024; gross sum awarded with claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay (4 weeks) awarded as damages for breach of contract; calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment under s.163 ERA 1996: 5 weeks' pay capped at £700 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,833
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.