Case 2202428/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J B Campagnoni v Irma Beruckaite t/a Irma’s Household Cleaning Services SITTING AT: London Central — 2026
- Case reference
- 2202428/2025
- Decision date
- 3 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Smart Sitting
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the claimant in person via CVP with a Spanish interpreter. The respondent had presented no ET3, did not attend and was not entitled to take part in the hearing. The Tribunal found that the claimant had two years' continuous service as an employee of the respondent.
The claim of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The basic award was £1,092 (two weeks' pay at £546). The compensatory award represented one month's full pay and twelve months' loss mitigated by the claimant at 50%, totalling £16,562 gross, uplifted by 25% to £20,702.50 because the respondent had undertaken no dismissal procedure (an unreasonable breach of the ACAS Code of Practice). The total unfair dismissal award was £21,794.50.
The claim for unlawful deductions from wages was also well-founded. The claimant was owed 394 hours at £13.00 per hour gross (£5,122), uplifted by 25% under the ACAS Code to £6,402.50 (the claimant had grieved about the unpaid wages but received no response). The total judgment payment due is £28,197 gross, of which £21,684 is taxable through the normal payroll under PAYE.
Claims and outcomes
2 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £21,795 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £6,403 |
Legal tests applied
1 referenceRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £28,197
- Basic award
- £1,092
- Compensatory award
- £20,703
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.