Case 2202471/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Abosimov v Ideaworks (London) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2202471/2020
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented his claim on 24 April 2020 complaining of "wrongful termination". The tribunal recorded that he had insufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and that the unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out by a judgment dated 27 November 2020.
The claimant accepted that he had been paid his notice pay, so the tribunal struck out his wrongful dismissal claim, described in the reasons as wrongful dismissal (breach of contract). The tribunal also noted that a letter of 10 December 2020 referred to a failure to conduct collective redundancy consultations, but that was not a claim set out in the original claim form. The judgment therefore recorded that the claims were dismissed, with no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that this claim was struck out by a judgment dated 27 November 2020 because the claimant had insufficient service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Described in the reasons as 'wrongful dismissal (breach of contract)'; struck out because the claimant accepted that notice pay had been paid. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.