Case 2202518/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sabrosa Creatividad Holdings Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202518/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent failed to file an ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1 and the respondent's default.
The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It recorded, however, that it did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for days without work in this situation.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant wages of £5,742.10 and to account to HMRC for any payments due. The hearing listed for 12 December 2019 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent did not file an ET3. The tribunal held the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages, but said it had no jurisdiction to award compensation for days without work in this situation. | Upheld | — | £5,742 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,742
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.