Case 2202586/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohamed Awais v Ellahi Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2202586/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohamed Awais
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central on 11 July 2023, Employment Judge Adkin, sitting alone, granted the respondent's application to extend time for presentation of a response. The tribunal then struck out the claim as an abuse of process.
The judgment does not record any merits findings on the underlying complaints or any compensatory award. It disposes of the case at claim level only, and the text does not break out separate findings for the pleaded public interest disclosure and race discrimination issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. It does not set out separate merits findings for the pleaded public interest disclosure complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. It does not set out separate merits findings for the race discrimination complaint. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.