Case 2202598/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Hindosh v Hunter & Partners Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2202598/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S. Hindosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London Central hearing by video on 6 and 7 October 2021, Employment Judge P Klimov, sitting alone, determined Mr S. Hindosh's unfair dismissal claim against Hunter & Partners Limited. The judgment records that the claim was brought under s.98B Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it failed; the claim was dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with the respondent's application for a costs order under rule 76(1)(a) and (b) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. That application also failed and was dismissed. The written judgment does not set out further factual findings or reasons beyond the stated outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim expressly brought under s.98B Employment Rights Act 1996; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.98B Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 76(1)(a) and (b) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.