Case 2202618/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr IJ Dobson v Digme Fitness Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202618/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr IJ Dobson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 13 January 2020 at London Central Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge Quill sat alone and heard the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's complaints of sex discrimination. The claimant was represented by Ms H Dinsa, a family member, and the respondent by Mr D Brown, counsel.
The tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the sex discrimination complaints. The written record does not give the oral reasons, and it states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent.
This decision is an interlocutory ruling only. It does not record any finding on the substantive merits of the sex discrimination complaints, and it does not record any monetary remedy or final outcome on the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records only that the respondent's application to strike out the complaints of sex discrimination was refused. It does not determine the substantive merits of the complaints. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.