Case 2202630/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Martins v Mitie Security Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202630/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Isaacson Date
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Martins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether the claimant's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims, which were presented outside the primary limitation periods, should be allowed to proceed. The claimant had been unwell from around 10 October 2018, was admitted to hospital in late October 2018, transferred between Priory hospitals, and discharged on 7 March 2019.
For the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time. It accepted that after discharge he believed his employer would resolve matters until the end of May 2019, then acted swiftly by seeking advice, contacting ACAS, and presenting the claim. The tribunal accepted that ACAS incorrectly told him he had until 12 July 2019 to present the claim, and found it reasonable for him to rely on that advice.
For the disability discrimination claims, the tribunal found it just and equitable to extend time. It found there was a reasonable explanation for the delay, that the claimant acted reasonably once he sought legal advice, that the respondent was not unreasonably prejudiced by the delay, and that a fair hearing remained possible.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal determined the limitation issue only. It found the unfair dismissal claim was outside the primary limitation period, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a reasonable further period, so the claim was allowed to proceed. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal determined the limitation issue only. It found the disability discrimination claims were outside the primary limitation period, but that it was just and equitable to extend time, so the claims were allowed to proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 111(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
- section 33 Limitation Act 1980 checklist
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.