Case 2202682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Ms K Clark (Solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202682/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Glennie at London Central on 14 January 2020. Ms T Giraud appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms K Clark, solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. It therefore did not determine the merits of that complaint.
The tribunal also struck out two allegations on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success: the allegation of direct discrimination or harassment committed by DL on 3 June 2019, and the allegation of direct discrimination or harassment committed by Mr G on 4 June 2019. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Allegation of direct discrimination or harassment committed by DL on 3 June 2019; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Allegation of direct discrimination or harassment committed by Mr G on 4 June 2019; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.