Case 2202689/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Nicholls, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202689/2019
- Decision date
- 12 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms G Nicholls, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing at London Central on 12 September 2019 before Employment Judge Davidson, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and Equality Act 2010 claims because they had been presented outside the relevant statutory time limits.
The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the claims and no monetary remedy. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless a written request was made within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because it had been presented outside the relevant statutory time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed because it had been presented outside the relevant statutory time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to claims under the Equality Act 2010, but does not specify the protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.